Is Ollagraph no-code like Browse AI?

No — Ollagraph is API-first. You call an endpoint with a bearer token and get JSON back. That's the deliberate trade-off: less point-and-click for non-coders, far more power and composability for engineers and agents.

Can Ollagraph monitor a page for changes like a Browse AI robot?

Yes, programmatically. Schedule the call from your own scheduler or pipeline, run it as an async job, and receive results via webhook — then diff against the previous result on your side. You own the cadence and the comparison rather than configuring a visual monitor.

How does pricing compare?

Ollagraph prices in credits — 1 per call, failed calls auto-refund — with pay-as-you-go from $5 and 1,000 free credits. Browse AI prices by robot and monitored rows; compare on your workload on their pricing page.

Ollagraph vs Browse AI — honest comparison

Browse AI lets non-coders build 'robots' that scrape and monitor sites with point-and-click and change alerts. Ollagraph is the API-first alternative for engineers and AI agents who'd rather call an endpoint.

What Browse AI does well

Browse AI made no-code scraping and monitoring genuinely approachable — record a robot by clicking through a page, schedule it, and get change-detection alerts when the data moves. For non-technical teams that need a watched data point or a prebuilt robot without writing code, it's a strong, friendly product.

Where Ollagraph goes further

API-first, not a recorded robot. Ollagraph is a single HTTP endpoint family with a bearer token — drop it into any pipeline, agent, or cron without recording or maintaining a visual robot.
Structured output + intelligence. Clean markdown, JSON-LD/OpenGraph extraction, plus DNS/WHOIS/SSL/enrichment in the same API.
Vertical actors + browser automation. Dedicated Amazon/Zillow/Maps extractors and persistent stealth sessions with natural-language actions.
Agent-native. An MCP server exposes the whole surface to AI agents — no per-site robot to build first.

Side by side

Feature	Browse AI	Ollagraph
No-code visual robot builder	Yes (its core)	API-first
Scheduled monitoring + change alerts	Yes	Async jobs + webhooks
Programmatic HTTP API	Available	Native (the product)
Clean markdown output for LLMs	Not native	Native
Domain intelligence (DNS / WHOIS / SSL)	Not offered	Included
Vertical actors (Amazon, Zillow, Maps)	Per-robot	Dedicated extractors
MCP server for AI agents	Not offered	Included
Free to start	Free plan	1,000 credits

Who each is best for

Choose Browse AI if: Non-technical teams that want point-and-click robots and scheduled change-monitoring on specific pages without writing or calling code.

Choose Ollagraph if: Engineering and AI teams who want a programmatic API — scraping plus structured output plus intelligence plus actors plus agent tooling — they can wire into a pipeline or hand to an agent.

Sources & further reading

The standards behind every tool in this comparison, for readers who want the primary sources rather than our summary of them:

Web scraping (Wikipedia) — the category these tools operate in, with its technical and legal background.
RFC 9309 — Robots Exclusion Protocol (IETF, 2022) — the robots.txt standard a responsible crawler honors.
JSON-LD 1.1 (W3C Recommendation) — the structured-data format these tools extract.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (Lewis et al., 2020) — the AI pattern most of this web data ultimately feeds.

Ollagraph vs Browse AI